🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actress has joined the growing list of actors who voice skepticism about the necessity of intimacy coordinators, explaining she chose not to use their services while filming her latest project her upcoming film.

Examining the Role of On-Set Intimacy Professionals

On-set intimacy professionals were introduced following the #MeToo movement to guarantee the safety and comfort of actors during scenes involving partial undress and intimate moments. Yet, numerous prominent performers including Gwyneth Paltrow and Sean Bean have expressed reservations about their involvement, with some claiming they interfere with artistic process.

Lawrence's Personal Experience

In conversation on the popular culture podcast, while promoting her new film where she portrays a woman experiencing mental health challenges, the actress stated: "We chose not to use an intimacy coordinator, or maybe we had the option but didn't really utilize them... I felt completely safe with Robert."

She continued: "Rob is not pervy and deeply devoted to his partner. Our conversations mostly revolved around our children and relationships. There was never awkward tension or doubts about personal boundaries."

"Had there been even a hint of unease, I would have insisted on an on-set professional. Many male performers get upset if you aren't interested in their attention, and then the negative treatment starts. Rob was completely different."

Professional Validation and Continuing Discussion

Earlier this week, industry platform IMDb officially recognized on-set intimacy professionals as a separate category, alongside eleven other professional roles including dance direction, catering, and puppetry. Before this, they were categorized as "additional crew" rather than having their own designation.

Notwithstanding this validation, these professionals still encounter media scrutiny implying they might not be required standards, with well-known actors rejecting their involvement. Jennifer's viewpoint echoes that of Jennifer Aniston, who earlier shared she refused intimacy coordination while working with Jon Hamm on their television series.

Jennifer's Perspective

"He proved to be extremely respectful – truly each action, every cut, 'You comfortable?'" she remembered. "The scenes were additionally carefully planned. That's the benefit of working with skilled editors, suitable lighting. So, minimal preparation is needed."

Aniston continued, "They offered, 'Professional verification if you're comfortable,' and I responded, 'Honestly, this is awkward enough!' We're experienced professionals – we can handle this. And we had our director present."

Other Examples and Industry Reaction

Although including numerous scenes of intimate moments and frequent nudity, Anora – Sean Baker's acclaimed project about a sex worker and a Russian oligarch's son – filmed without an intimacy coordinator.

Mikey Madison stated she and co-star Mark Eydelshteyn "concluded it would be preferable to maintain privacy."

"My character is a professional in adult entertainment, and I had researched the director's work and understood his dedication to realism. I was mentally prepared for it. As an performer, I treated it as professional work."

These statements generated significant backlash from intimacy coordinators, similar to the response to Gwyneth Paltrow's recent comments, who earlier this year shared that working on her forthcoming project her latest film represented her initial experience with the relatively new profession, which she "did not know existed."

Paltrow's Perspective

During filming about personal ease with a particular action alongside fellow actor her younger counterpart, the actress responded: "I belong to the era where you remove clothing, you assume position, the filming begins."

Paltrow added that she and her co-star then informed the professional: "We believe we're good. You can maintain distance.' I don't know how it is for newer performers, but... if someone is directing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an artist, extremely restricted by that."

Industry Response

After these statements, industry executive an experienced producer described them as "concerning" and highlighted that most of those speaking against intimacy coordinators have established careers to command their own power and protection on film sets.

"Occasionally an performer makes comments about whether they value intimacy coordinators or not," said Hollick. "The actress mentioned she came of age in a time when people in Hollywood 'removed clothing and got on with it'. As a powerful woman in Hollywood performing alongside a man considerably junior than her, although likely he is chill, I considered it somewhat concerning remark."

Male Perspective

The veteran actor, in contrast, expressed that he feels the primary responsibility during heterosexual sex scenes rests with the male actor, rather than a third party.

"Based on my career, you take responsibility as the male actor to make certain the woman is at ease, you talk through thoroughly," he explained. "You state, '{OK, I'm going to make contact there if that's agreeable'. It's very deliberate but seems like it's happening naturally, which is ideally what convincing acting appears as."